By Josh Perry, Editor
Scientists from Griffith University (Australia) demonstrated over a year-long experiment that phase-change materials (PCM) were several times more effective at absorbing heat than concrete and they could help reduce the cost of cooling buildings.
Using PCM in building construction could reduce the cost of cooling.
According to a report from the school, researchers were exploring methods for reducing energy costs by having the building absorb heat during the day, store it, and release the heat at night once it cools.
Using PCM in insulation, researchers validated computer simulations about the required thickness of the material and the overall thermal performance. “The findings revealed that for some Australian climatic zones, phase-change materials could be highly beneficial and offer a good return on investment if the right material and configuration was chosen,” the article added.
The research was recently published in Building and Environment. The abstract stated:
“Night ventilation (NV) is a productive passive cooling technique which demonstrates a high potential for reducing cooling loads and improving thermal comfort; however, its efficiency is highly contingent upon such factors as thermal energy storage. In the current building industry where utilizing lightweight structures is of paramount importance, the usage of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) as efficient lightweight thermal energy storage for NV is becoming rapidly prevalent.
“Although the effects of the independent variables of NV and PCMs are well-known, their interrelationship has not been clearly established. This study therefore set out to explore the correlation between PCM quantity and transition temperatures, as well as NV airflow and delta temperature, thermal insulation and the resulting energy saving.
“To do so, a model, validated utilizing a full-scale calorimeter, was employed for numerical simulations of three different climates. It was found that in tropical climates, coupling NV with PCMs was non-effective. Nevertheless, in sub-tropical and hot-dry climates, cooling thermostat set-points, as well as thermal insulation play a key role in defining the optimal PCM temperature utilized for NV.
“The optimal transitional temperature, however, is not dependent on the PCM thicknesses, but thickening PCMs raises energy saving. The use of well-insulated envelopes increases NV efficiency and stabilizes the optimal PCM transition temperature, defined as 1?°C lower than the cooling set-point temperature. It is also concluded that the importance of thermal insulation in raising NV efficiency is greater than PCM volume.
“Furthermore, low delta temperature and high airflow result in increasing NV efficiency; however, these phenomena have no effect on the optimal PCM meting temperature.”